Staggered Planes: Location Specifics and Motivated Lighting
We've taken a look at the first shoot so far, which was a lot of fun and was really focused on recreating something pretty authentically, or at least to the best of our ability. For this one, we were looking to do something a little bit more of a bigger production, a little bit wider, a little bit more involved, and not rooted in something we had to adhere to quite so specifically. Just to throw this back up on the screen, this was the source material that we are working from. It gave me a general idea of what I wanted that composition to look like. You can see the bigger plane in the foreground, the Spitfire in the background. I've got someone standing on the back of the Spitfire, which I thought would give me a little bit of visual interest back in that corner. I've got the two guys interacting in the foreground. Now, I also, for this shot, only have two subjects. When I was looking at the, researching the source images for this, the ones that I really liked were the ones that had a ...
lot of different people in the scene. What I would do in addition to having the scene created over on the left-hand side was actually had them take off their hat, move around in the scene. Because they were all out of focus, they got to play multiple roles in the image. We're gonna go ahead and take a look at the intro to this and get us started. We're setting up here for shoot two, so I wanna take you through, logistically, a little bit of what's happening. Now, for the most part, the entire approach to this particular shot is very similar to the first one. The theory behind it, what is motivating the shot, really pretty similar. Again, I'm using scrims this time. They're stacked one on top of the other to give me a little bit more coverage for my two subjects standing up, because the light has now moved and we have changed positions, so the light's a little bit more directionally to the front. Which is fine for hard light, but I actually want it to be a little bit softer so it matches the other image. Now, I know that this is gonna create a few complications in the image. Basically, I am looking at harder shadows across the board. I've got hard shadows on the ground because of the scrim. This is something that I'm actually going to have to remove a little bit in post-production. It's gonna be a little bit tricky on that particular idea, but I do need to spend some time softening those shadows a little bit if I wanna get something that feels very similar. Also, the light is now not totally separate from the scrims. I'm shooting through the scrims. Again, this is about creating light that's already motivated by reality. By putting a light through the scrim and making it a little bit more powerful, it kinda works the light that is already there, but it becomes, the background becomes a little bit more dramatic because we're able to overpower it a little bit. I am still shooting on my 3-stop ND with the polarizer, so it allows me to shoot at a pretty low aperture, along with my relatively slow shutter speed. I'm shooting, again, at 2.8. I'm gonna be at 1/125th of a second in ISO 100. The lens choice for this particular image is a little bit different from the first one. In the first one, we shot with a 90 mil lens, somewhat similar, with 72 millimeter on a full frame. That gave us a significant amount of compression between the subject and the background, put the background really out of focus and kept the perspective pretty consistent. Here we've switched to a 55 mil lens, which is about a 40 mil equivalent on a full frame. If you think about it, it's somewhat similar to about a medium length, 50 millimeter lens on a full frame, more or less. And so, what that's gonna do is it's gonna give me a little bit of distance between my foreground, midground, and background. We're creating a little bit more depth with this composition. The bomber is taking the left side of the frame. The Spitfire is now in the back, and it's creating converging lines of perspective. The bomber, on the one hand, is gonna poke in the left side of the frame in camera and the Spitfire is gonna go in the back. It's a little bit of a zig-zag of composition, helps us showcase a little bit of depth. I am still on this lens running my ND filter, the 3-stop ND with the polarizer. That's helping me gauge what the reflections on top of the glass look like a little bit. I can temper that and make that look exactly how I want. A polarizer, when on, is also gonna give me a little bit more blue to the sky. Because this particular sky is pretty without, pretty much no clouds, the little bit of extra blue helps it retain a little bit of something visual so it just doesn't look completely washed out. I have that going for it as well. I've got the scrims in place. Obviously, they are needing to be supported and held up. It's a little bit precarious. We're kind of, at this particular point, almost holding up giant sails when they're sideways like this. What I'm trying to sort out is making sure the height of my octabox is correct. Too high, it's gonna skull out the eyes. I'm trying to make it a little bit lower and balance it to my subjects. They are gonna be on the left side of the frame. We're gonna have 'em interacting, shaking hands. Then, in the background, we're gonna add in, one of 'em, we're gonna have him do double duty and stand on the Spitfire in the back. They're gonna be out of focus, so you're not gonna be able to see it, but it's gonna give us a little bit of extra depth, and we can utilize the fact that we are using only two people to achieve the roles of three. All right, so let's take a look at what that lighting diagram looks like. I have my two subjects. This is obviously just a small section of what you're about to see in terms of the overall scene, but it's what I have to light. I've got the two guys. They are interacting with each other in my frame. They are blocked from the sun by scrims, and I've had to stack these. This was a little bit precarious, because remember how I said we generally wanted to make them flat? Well, we couldn't. Because of the angle of the sun, they were hitting 'em pretty straight on. They are really heavily anchored, and made sure that someone is standing with them so they don't blow away. Now, to soften that light, but give it a little bit more of a punch, that five-foot octabox is behind it, which basically reinforces the direction of the overall light so it's not competing. It's meant to feel a little bit natural. But the light itself is gonna be quite a bit more flattering than what that hard direct sunlight would have been. That's the reason for putting that over on the left-hand side. Basically, the sun and the octabox are coming from the same direction, but the octabox is a little bit more powerful relative to what the subjects' light would be naturally with those scrims in place. That's what the lighting looks like. I believe we have a question.
Yeah. When you're taking multiple shots and composing multiple shots, are you thinking about a narrative or continuity between the shots, or is it okay if they end up looking really different?
I mean, it totally depends on what the purpose of the set of images is meant to be. Because we were in this one location, I was aiming for cohesion. I wanted them to look similar, and I had spent quite a bit of time in the development process last night messing around with it because I wanted to make an image that was back-lit, almost, more or less, match something that's front-lit. It took me a little bit of time and effort to play with those contrasting tonal values a little bit to match it up. Secondarily to that, the color of everything that's in the image is a lot different. In the first image, I went a little bit more traditionally RAF, where there's a lot more blues in the frame, whereas this one uses a lot more yellows and greens. I also wanted to play a bit with tempering that color to balance it out. I took the opportunity to make it seem like they were a series of images. Even though they're both very different scenes, they at least feel close. Because I wanted some cohesion, I can present them together and say, "Hey, look at this project I shot," versus, "Hey, these couples of singular images "that don't really connect to anything "one way or the other." There's no rule that says you have to. I just think it's a little bit more impactful when it's presented as something bigger than one frame.